OriginalPaper | Open access | Published: June 7, 2026

Pedagogical Mediation by Academic Librarians with ICT for the Development of Critical Thinking in Library and Information Science Students: A Systematic Review

Kayode Sunday John Dada, Romoke Opeyemi Quadir
EduLine: Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026), pp. 96-108 https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.eduline4683 Published: 2026-06-07
Get Permissions

Abstract

This systematic review examines how pedagogical mediation by academic librarians using Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) contributes to the development of critical thinking among Library and Information Science (LIS) students at Ahmadu Bello University (ABU), Zaria. Employing the PRISMA 2020 framework, 81 peer-reviewed empirical studies published between 2013 and 2026 were identified, screened, and synthesised from SCOPUS, Web of Science, and supplementary databases. The review is grounded in the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework of Mishra and Koehler (2006). Qualitative thematic synthesis and quantitative Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric analysis were applied to compare critical thinking skill development, ICT tool effectiveness, assessment strategies, and institutional challenges across undergraduate students, postgraduate students, and academic librarians. Results reveal that problem-based learning with ICT (? = .48, p < .001) and blended learning environments (? = .41, p < .001) are the most effective pedagogical approaches for developing critical thinking, while lack of ICT pedagogical training (H = 14.67, p < .001) and role ambiguity for academic librarians (H = 13.77, p < .001) emerge as the most significant barriers. Findings indicate that integrating TPACK-aligned pedagogical training for academic librarians substantially enhances their mediation capacity and, consequently, student critical thinking outcomes in LIS education at ABU Zaria.

Keywords

References (32)

  1. Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL). (2016). Framework for information literacy for higher education. American Library Association. https://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework
  2. Bell, S. J., & Shank, J. (2004). The blended librarian: A blueprint for redefining the teaching and learning role of academic librarians. College & Research Libraries News, 65(7), 372–375. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.65.7.7297
  3. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
  4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  5. Brantley-Dias, L., & Ertmer, P. A. (2013). Goldilocks and TPACK: Is the construct 'just right?' Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(2), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2013.10782615
  6. Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 31–51.
  7. Dent Young, J. (2018). Information literacy and critical thinking: Outcomes of academic library instruction in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 50(4), 392–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000616678750
  8. Elmborg, J. (2006). Critical information literacy: Implications for instructional practice. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(2), 192–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2005.12.004
  9. Ezeani, C. N. (2012). Library education in Nigeria: A review of challenges and opportunities. Library Philosophy and Practice, (800). https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/800
  10. Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction (The Delphi Report). American Philosophical Association.

How to Cite

Dada, K. S. J., & Quadir, romoke O. (2026). Pedagogical Mediation by Academic Librarians with ICT for the Development of Critical Thinking in Library and Information Science Students: A Systematic Review. EduLine: Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, 6(2), 96–108. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.eduline4683

Copyright & license

Copyright (c) 2026 Kayode Sunday John Dada, Romoke Opeyemi Quardir