Evaluation of Citizenship Education Learning Process Assessment
- Publication History
- Published online: December 31, 2023
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.daengku2119
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2023 Delfiyan Widiyanto, Annisa Istiqomah
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to know the evaluation of assessment of learning process of Citizenship education . Assessment of learning process as uaoaya to improve the quality of learning. The assessment of the learning process is conducted to measure the efficient, effective, and productivity of learning activities. Implementation of the 2013 curriculum has obstacles in starting from planning, implementation, and reporting. Implementation of curriculum implementation there are constraints on the use of learning methods, lack of time in learning activities, lack of learning materials, attitude difficulties, and curriculum facilities 2013 at SMA N se Palembang. Preliminary observation on the aspect of the assessment of the learning process conducted in SMA N in Gunungkidul District that less attention for assessment of the learning process. Type of research conducted with the type of evaluation of discrepancy model with quantitative descriptive approach . The research was conducted in SMA N of Gunungkidul Regency consisting of 11 senior high schools with 16 respondents of Citizenship education teachers using the 2013 curriculum. The results showed that the assessment of the learning process was carried out very well. Assessment process assessment consists of components namely planning, implementation, and results lapoaran. The planning stage is an excellent category with a t-score of 54.6186 , the implementation stage of the assessment of the learning process including the category is very good with t-score of 49.65875 , and the reporting stage of the results of the assessment process included the category less with a t-score of 20.93 . In the comparison stage of learning process gap disparity shows the percentage of the assessment plan implemented 98 % , the percentage of the implementation of the assessment is done 91% , and the percentage of assessment report of the learning process is done 45%.
References (26)
- Airasian, W. P. (1991). Classroom assessment. United States: Mc Graw Hill.
- Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2015). Pembelajaran, pengajaran, dan assesmen. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
- Bakry, M. (2014). Pendidikan kewarganegaraan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka pelajar.
- Brooker, R. (2006). Improving the assessment of practice teaching: a criteria and standards frameword. Asssessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 23 (1), 2-24.
- Daryanto. (2012). Evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
- Fernandes, H. J. X. (1984). Evaluation of education programs. Jakarta: National education planning evaluation and curriculum development.
- Gronlund, N. E & Lin, R. L. (1990) Measurement and evaluation in teaching. London: Macmillan Publishing Company.
- Keating, A. (2014). Education for citizhenship in europe. New York : Palgrave Macmillan.
- Kennedy, K. J., & Brunold, A. (Eds). (2016). Regionalism and citizenship education-new identities and new commitments. London & New York : Routledge.
- Kirkpatrick, D. L. & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating training program, the four levels (3ndEd). San Frasisco: Berret-Koehler Publisher inc.
- Majid, A. (2014). Penilaian autentik proses dan hasil belajar. Bandung: Rosdakarya.
- Mardapi, Djemari. (2016). Pegukuran, penilaian dan evaluasi pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.
- Pan, S. Y. (2017). Reframing citizhenship education in beijing: competing views and strategies. Oxford review of education. (2017)
- Patrick, J. J & Vontz, T. S. (2001). Components of education for democratic citizenship in the preparation of social studies teachers. Dalam Patrick, J. J & Leming, R. S (Eds). Principles and practices of democracy of democracy in the education of social studies teachers: civic learning in teachers education. Bloomington, Indiana, USA : Office of Educational Research and Imformation Center,
- Samsuri. (2011). Pendidikan kewarganegaraan sebagai wahana membangun karakter warga negara demokratis. Dalam Zuchdi, D. (Ed). Pendidikan karakter dalam perspektif teori dan praktik. UNY Press: Yogyakarta.
- Sanjaya, D. B., & Divayana, D. G. H. (2015). An Expert system –based evaluation of civics education as a means of character education based on local culture in the universities in buleleng. International journal of advanced research in artificial intelligence. 4 (12) 17-21.
- Stufflebeam, D.L & Shinkfield, (1985). A. System evaluation. United State of America: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.
- Subali, B. (2016). Prinsip asesmen dan evaluasi pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.
- Sudjana, N. (2014). Penilaian hasil proses belajar mengajar. Bandung: Rosdakarya.
- Sudjono, (2006). A. Pengantar evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada.
- Sumantri, (2015). M. S. Strategi pembelajaran teori dan praktek di tingkat sekolah dasar. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
- Veldhuis, R. (1997). Education for democratic citizenship, core competence, variables, and international activities. Paper seminar on basic concepts and core competence, council for culture cooperation, strasbourg, Prancis 11-12 Desember 1997. United States of America: Educational resources information center.
- Veurgelers, W. (2007). Creating critical-democrtatic citizenship education: empowering humanity and democracy in dutch education. Compare: a Journal of comparative and international education. 37 (1) 105-119.
- Wallace, G. & Larsen, S. C. (1978). Educational assessment of learning problems testing for teaching. United States of America: Allyn and Bacon.
- Widoyoko, S. E. (2016). Hasil Pembelajaran di Sekolah. Yogyakarta: Pustaka.
- Wulandari, D. A., Faisal, E. E., & Waluyati, S. A . (2016). Faktor-faktor penghambat implementasi kurikulum 2013 bagi guru mata pelajaran Citizenship education di SMA N Se Kota Palembang. Jurnal Bhineka Tunggal ika. 3 (1), 72-83.
