The Effect of Human Resource Management and Principal Leadership on Improving the Quality of Education: (Study at Modern Islamic High School in Eastern Serang Regency)

Muhammad Miqdad Arromy; Agus Gunawan; Machdum Bachtiar; Anis Fauzi

doi:10.35877/454RI.daengku1418

Authors

Muhammad Miqdad Arromy UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten
Agus Gunawan UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten
Machdum Bachtiar UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten
Anis Fauzi UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.daengku1418

Keywords:

Principal, Leadership, HRM, Education Quality

Abstract

This study aims to determine the level of respondent achievement (TCR) on human resource management (HRM), principal leadership, and education quality as well as, to determine the effect of HRM, and/or principal leadership on improving the quality of education in Modern Islamic Boarding High Schools in Eastern Serang Regency. The method used is a survey method using a quantitative approach. The variables used in the study, namely the independent variables include HRM and principal leadership, and the dependent variable is the quality of education. The instrument used was a questionnaire with a Likert scale. Data analysis techniques used are descriptive statistical analysis techniques and inferential statistics include prerequisite tests in the form of normality tests and linearity tests, then simple regression analysis tests and multiple regression analysis tests. The results showed that 1) TCR on HRM is in the very good category with a value of 86.7%; 2) TCR on the principal's leadership is also in the very good category with a value of 87.2%; 3) Furthermore, TCR on the quality of education is in the very good category with a value of 89.3%; 4) there is a positive influence between HRM and the quality of education, namely by rejecting H0 because the significance value of 0.000 <0.05; 5) as well as there is a positive influence between the principal's leadership and the quality of education, namely by rejecting H0, because the significance value of 0.000 <0.05; 6) and there is a positive influence between HRM and principal leadership on the quality of education, namely by rejecting H0 because the significance value of 0.000 <0.05 and and Fhitung 23.548 greater than Ftable 3.32. The influence of HRM and principal leadership on the quality of education is 61.9%.

Author Biographies

Agus Gunawan, UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten

Machdum Bachtiar, UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten

Anis Fauzi, UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten

References

Abrori, M., Muali, C. (2020). Peningkatan Kualitas Sumber Daya Manusia Melalui Peran Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah. JUMPA: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Vol. 1 No. 1.
Agus Tulus, Moh. (1992). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Jakarta: PT.Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Aimah, S., Laeliyah, N. Pengaruh Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Terhadap Mutu Pendidik. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam Darussalam (JMPID) Vol. 3, No. 1: 32-51.
Amrin, Hasriana. (2020). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah Terhadap Mutu Pendidikan Di SMP Negeri 8 Palopo (Skripsi tidak diterbitkan). Palopo: IAIN.
Arifin, E. Zaenal. (2012). Dasar-dasar Penulisan Karangan Ilmiah. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Arikunto, Suharsimin. (2009). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta..
Asrohah, Hanun. (2015). Manajemen Mutu Pendidikan. Surabaya: Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya Press.
Djafri, Novianty. (2017). Manajemen Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah (Pengetahuan Manajemen, Efektivitas, Kemandirian Keunggulan Bersaing dan Kecerdasan Emosi). Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
Effendi, Mukhlison. (2021). Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia dalam Meningkatkan Citra Lembaga di Lembaga Pendidikan Islam. Southeast Asian Journal of Islamic Education Management , Vol. 2 No. 1.
Fadhli, Muhammad. (2017). Manajemen Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan. TADBIR : Jurnal Studi Manajemen Pendidikan Vol. I, No. 02.
Hasan , Iqbal. (2006). Analisis Data Penelitian Dengan Statistik. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Hasibuan, Malayu Sp. (2020). Manajemen SDM edisi revisi cetakan ke 20. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Hermanto, E. Yudiawan. (2019). Analisis Data Mutu Pendidikan Jenjang SMA Provinsi Banten. Artikel BPMP Banten.
Hermawan, Iwan. (2019) Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan (Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Mixed Method). Kuningan : Hidayatul Quran,.
Machali, Imam. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Yogyakarta: MPI.
Margono. (2004). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta :Rineka Cipta.
Masram, Mu’ah. (2015). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Sidoarji: Zifatama Publish.
Mondy, Noe. (1990). Human Resource Management 4th Edition. Boston: Allynand Bacon.
Notoadmodjo, Soekidjo. (1992). Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Priyatno, Dwi. (2012). Cara Kilat Belajar Analisis Data dengan SPSS 20. Yogyakarta: CV. Andi Offset.
Putri, G. A. M., Maharani, S. P. , Nisrina, G. (2022). Literature View Pengorganisasian: SDM, Tujuan Organisasi Dan Struktur Organisasi. JEMSI: Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen Sistem Informasi Vol. 3, Issue 3.
Sari, A. J. D. R., Giatman, M., Ernawati. (2021). Peran Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Pendidikan. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Vol. 5, No. 3, 329-333.
Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suryana, S. (2017). Permasalahan Mutu Pendidikan Perspektif Pembangunan Pendidikan”, Journal UNNES.
Turney, C., et al. (1992). The School Manager; Educational Management Roles and Task. Sydney : Allen & Unwim.
Widjajakusuma, M. K., Yusanto, M. I. (2002). Pengantar Manajemen Syariat. Jakarta: Khoirul Bayan.
Wirawan. (2013). Kepemimpinan Teori, Psikologi, Perilaku Organisasi, Aplikasi dan Penelitian. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Yukl, Gary. (2009). Leadership in Organizations, Sixth Edition. New Delhi: Dorling Kindersley.
Zainuddin, Muhadi. (2002). Studi Kepemimpinan Islam, Yogyakarta: Al-Muhsin press.