ARTICLES · Volume 2, Issue 4 · 529-536 · August 2022 · Open Access

The Effect of Economic Growth, Government Spending, and Human Development Index toward Inequality of Income Distribution in the Metropolitan Cities in Indonesia

Alfath Shifa Ghifara, Achmad Nur Iman, Akhmad Kusuma Wardhana, Sulistya Rusgianto, Ririn Tri Ratnasari
Download PDF Set Alert Previous article Next article

Abstract

This study aims to determine and analyze the influence of economic growth, government capital expenditure, and human development index on the inequality of income distribution in Metropolitan Cities in Indonesia. This type of research is descriptive associative research, where the data used is secondary data from 2012 to 2021 obtained from relevant agencies, which were analyzed using the panel data regression method. The findings of this study indicate that the human development index has a negative and significant effect on the inequality of income distribution in Metropolitan Cities in Indonesia, capital expenditures and economic growth have a positive and insignificant effect on the inequality of income distribution in Metropolitan Cities in Indonesia. Taken together, only the human development index has a significant effect on the inequality of income distribution in Metropolitan Cities in Indonesia.

References (25)

  1. Agusalim, L., & Pohan, F. S. (2018). Trade Openness Effect on Income Inequality: Empirical Evidence from Indonesia. Signifikan: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 7(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjie.v7i1.5527
  2. Almasi-Hashiani, A., Sepidarkish, M., Vesali, S., & Omani Samani, R. (2016). The correlation of human development index on fertility and mortality rate: a global ecological study. International Journal of Pediatrics, 4(12), 4071–4080.
  3. Anto, M., H. (2013). Introducing an Islamic Human Development Index (I-HDI) to Measure Development in OIC Countries. Islamic Economic Studies, Vol. 19 No.2, Life 1, 69–95.
  4. Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Ardakani, A. (2020). Does GINI respond to income volatility in an asymmetric manner? Evidence from 41 countries. Economic Systems, 44(2), 100756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2020.100756
  5. Barata, A. (2019). STRENGTHENING NATIONAL ECONOMIC GROWTH AND EQUITABLE INCOME THROUGH SHARIA DIGITAL ECONOMY IN INDONESIA. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 5(1), 145–168.
  6. Barkah, T., Rusgianto, S., & Wardhana, A. (2022). Impact of Agricultural Land and the Output of Agricultural Products Moderated with Internet Users toward the Total export of Agricultural Product in Three Islamic South East Asian Countries. Media Agribisnis, 6(1 SE - Articles). https://doi.org/10.35326/agribisnis.v6i1.2261
  7. Brunkhorst, H. (2020). A Marxist Educated Kant: Philosophy of History in Kant and the Frankfurt School. Kantian Review, 25(4), 515–540.
  8. Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97–113.
  9. Brynjolfsson, E., Diewert, W. E., Eggers, F., Fox, K. J., & Gannamaneni, A. (2018). The Digital Economy, GDP and Consumer Welfare: Theory and Evidence. ESCoE Conference on Economic Measurement, Bank of England, 16–17.
  10. Faizah, S. I., & Husaeni, U. A. (2018). Development of Consumption and Supplying Energy in Indonesia’s Economy. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 8(6), 313–321.

Keywords

Citation

Ghifara, A. S., Iman, A. N., Wardhana, A. K., Rusgianto, S., & Ratnasari , R. T. (2022). The Effect of Economic Growth, Government Spending, and Human Development Index toward Inequality of Income Distribution in the Metropolitan Cities in Indonesia . Daengku: Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Innovation, 2(4), 529–536. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.daengku1092
PublishedAugust 31, 2022
Volume2 - 2022
Pages529-536